One of his most often repeated claims is that full time jobs are disappearing as a result of Obamacare.
The Affordable Care Act, in an effort to not financially over-burden small businesses that may not be able to afford it, originally allowed a minimum employee requirement of at least 25 full time employees before a business must provide employee healthcare. In order to compromise with Republicans, the law was later changed to require a minimum of at least 50 full time employees before insurance coverage was required. Full time employees are defined as workers with at least 40 hours of work per week or 2080 hours of work per year.
This requirement was intended to protect businesses that may really be endangered financially if they were forced to provide insurance to their employees. In other words, those businesses that may be forced out of business if they had to provide health insurance and could find no other way to save costs. The Act also attempts to protect such fragile small businesses by providing tax credits of up to 50% of the non-elective contributions the employer made on behalf of its employees.
According to Boehner, businesses which do not fit the criteria are now using these allowances to side-step providing insurance for their employees. Boehner cites one example of a business owner of 21 (yes, that's twenty-one) Subway restaurants who decided to reduce the hours of employees so that he could use the allowance to avoid having to provide health insurance. Another report indicates that Wal-Mart is reducing full time employees and increasing part time employees (ten times more than last year) to keep costs down. Apparently offering insurance is going to break the bank of the wealthiest family in the retail business. Wal-Mart employs some of the lowest paid workers in the United States and in so doing are taking advantage of taxpayers who provide supplements to Wal-Mart employees wages in such programs as supplemental nutrition, medicaid, and increased medical premiums for unpaid medical bills.
It is odd that Boehner sees this as an Obamacare caused phenomenon instead of placing the blame where it belongs, on greedy and uncaring business owners. I was struck by the statement of the wealthy subway owner who was quoted as saying "I know the impact that I am having on some of my employees." The article left out the remaining thought that was obviously knocking around inside the owner's head but didn't come out...the one that goes something like "but I don't care."
Now there are plenty of studies that indicate the majority of employers are not side-stepping Obamacare by taking what most would say are unethical steps to avoid it, so this rant that Boehner is taking may just be another Republican ruse that uses fear to deceive. Republican leadership appears adamant to fight Obamacare by any unethical means possible, just as some unethical business owners are sure to use tactics that they have always used to avoid providing benefits for their employees.
The only fault I see with the Affordable Care Act law is the fact that there was a business allowance at all. Short of being a single payer program, it should have required all business to provide insurance and perhaps give tax breaks based on the size of the business, with smaller businesses getting more of a tax break. The temptation was too great for dishonest business owners to use it as a loop-hole and then flaunt their arrogance by blaming the law for their unethical behavior.
So let's call it like it is Mr Speaker. You can't blame Obamacare for the unethical actions of your constituents.